Key Points
-
Starship successfully deployed 26 next-generation Starlink satellites in September.
-
Starship’s satellite capacity could unlock billions in annual revenue.
-
Failed launches could jeopardize multibillion-dollar commercial space projects.
-
Space Exploration Technologies (NASDAQ: SPCX) has already demonstrated that its Starship rocket can deliver satellites into orbit. On Sept. 28, the company launched 26 next-generation Starlink satellites during Starship’s 14th test flight. But the mission wasn’t entirely successful. An engine shut down early, forcing SpaceX to cut the flight from a planned 10 hours to about three hours.
Now SpaceX is targeting November for Starship’s 15th test flight, when it plans to attempt recovery of both stages of the rocket for the first time. A successful recovery would represent a major step toward routine commercial operations and significantly lower launch costs.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a “Double Down” signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same “Total Conviction” signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
$1.65 billion in additional annual revenue
Starship is designed to carry much larger payloads than SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, potentially allowing the company to deploy more satellites at a lower cost per satellite. And indeed, the financial implications are not trivial.
Based on a 2025 analysis by advisory firm Rational Futures, a full Starship payload of next-generation Starlink satellites could support approximately $1.65 billion in additional annual revenue. Applying that estimate proportionally to the 26 satellites launched in September suggests roughly $715 million in potential annual revenue.
A failed flight could cost millions
SpaceX hasn’t disclosed a standardized commercial price for Starship launches. However, outside estimates have placed early launch costs around $100 million per mission. That said, a failure could also destroy valuable satellites, delay future launches, and increase development expenses.
For example, Voyager Technologies (NYSE: VOYG) plans to launch its Starlab commercial space station aboard Starship. Voyager expects Starlab to cost between $2.8 billion and $3.3 billion to develop, build, and launch. Yet the commercial insurance market currently offers only about $650 million in coverage for a single launch, potentially leaving billions of dollars in project costs exposed if something goes wrong.
To be clear, SpaceX’s long-term ambition is to reduce launch costs dramatically through reusable rockets. But it still needs to prove that Starship can fly reliably and be recovered repeatedly.
Should you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies right now?
Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $334,793!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,257,420!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 874% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 209% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 31, 2026.
Jeff Siegel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Voyager Technologies. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
