Key Points
-
Space Exploration Technologies reversed a billion-dollar loss from last year after reporting $4.4 billion in net income during the third quarter.
-
Interestingly, $561 million of this reported profit came from outside SpaceX’s core operations.
-
A better way to gauge SpaceX’s financial health is to look at operating income instead of net income.
-
Earlier this week, Space Exploration Technologies (NASDAQ: SPCX), better known as SpaceX, surprised Wall Street with an impressive third-quarter earnings report. Elon Musk’s space exploration and artificial intelligence (AI) company generated $14.6 billion in revenue and reported $4.4 billion in net income, reversing a loss of $1.1 billion in the year-ago quarter.
At first glance, these results suggest SpaceX reached an important profitability milestone. But a finer detail buried in the company’s 10-Q deserves closer attention. SpaceX recognized a $561 million gain associated with its equity investment in The Boring Company, another business founded by Musk.
Missed Nvidia in 2009? This Rare Signal Is Flashing Again. In 2009, a “Double Down” signal flashed for a little-known chipmaker called Nvidia. For the first time in years, that same “Total Conviction” signal is flashing for a company 1/100th the size of Nvidia. Continue »
Although this is legitimate under accounting rules, this gain did not generate any cash for SpaceX. Let’s explore what exactly happened, why it matters, and what investors should watch as SpaceX accelerates its infrastructure spending.
How SpaceX recorded a profit without receiving any cash
To understand how this accounting adjustment works, imagine you bought a baseball card for $100. Several months or years later, someone else purchases the same card for $200. Based on that transaction, you determine that your card is now worth $200. You’re technically $100 “wealthier” on paper, but you haven’t actually sold your card or received another $100 in your bank account.
This is essentially what happened with SpaceX. The company owns a stake in The Boring Company, Musk’s tunneling and transportation business. In September, The Boring Company raised $3 billion in Series D financing. Investors purchased shares at a $20 billion valuation, giving SpaceX fresh insight into the value of its existing investment.
Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), SpaceX can measure this investment using its fair value. As a result, the company recognized a $561 million unrealized investment gain. An unrealized gain simply means an asset has increased in value, but its owner hasn’t sold it.
SpaceX recorded this increase under Other income, allowing the gain to flow through its income statement and contribute to reported profitability. There’s nothing inherently suspicious about this accounting treatment. However, investors should understand that the gain doesn’t come from the company’s operations in launching rockets, selling Starlink subscriptions, or providing AI computing services.
SpaceX’s profitability can be measured a different way
As referenced, SpaceX reported $4.4 billion in net income during the third quarter. By excluding the $561 million Boring Company gain, the company’s normalized net income would be closer to $3.8 billion. However, this is technically an imperfect way to measure profitability because it doesn’t account for differences in tax effects when recognizing investment gains versus not recognizing them.
I think a better way to judge SpaceX is by looking at operating income. Operating income measures the money a company earns from its core business segments after operating expenses, but before interest, taxes, and other financial items.
The table illustrates SpaceX’s operating income by business unit compared to last year.
| Business Segment |
Q3 2026 Operating Income |
Q3 2025 Operating Income |
| Space |
($7) million |
$259 million |
| Connectivity (Starlink) |
$2.4 billion |
$1.2 billion |
| Super Intelligence (SI) |
$431 million |
($1.7) billion |
| Total |
$2.8 billion |
($273) million |
Data source: Investor relations.
These figures illustrate how SpaceX’s operating performance is genuinely improving. However, there’s another wrinkle investors need to understand: Accounting profits are not the same as free cash flow.
SpaceX is spending unprecedented sums expanding its infrastructure. During the third quarter alone, the company spent $19.6 billion in capital expenditures (capex), including $16.4 billion attributable to its AI business. For perspective, that investment was larger than SpaceX’s entire reported revenue for the quarter.
Moreover, the company spent $48.1 billion in capex through the first nine months of the year, compared with $13.1 billion in operating cash flow. Simple math shows a $35 billion deficit between cash generation and infrastructure spending.
Of course, this doesn’t mean SpaceX is running out of money. The company’s historic IPO and debt financing provide enough liquidity to fund its various build-outs for the time being. The main takeaway here is that the company is spending considerably more on infrastructure than its operations currently generate in cash.
Is SpaceX’s noncash gain a red flag?
At the end of the day, SpaceX’s accelerating revenue and improving operating margins are encouraging. My thought is that the $561 million noncash gain from The Boring Company is a normal accounting adjustment rather than evidence of misleading financial reporting.
With that said, investors should look beyond the company’s headline profit going forward and focus more on operating income, capex, and free cash flow. Those figures will ultimately tell us whether SpaceX is building a financially sustainable industrial conglomerate or simply spending too much to pursue its ambitions.
Should you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies right now?
Before you buy stock in Space Exploration Technologies, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Space Exploration Technologies wasn’t one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $361,596!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005… if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you’d have $1,303,935!*
Now, it’s worth noting Stock Advisor’s total average return is 910% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 211% for the S&P 500. Don’t miss the latest top 10 list, available with Stock Advisor, and join an investing community built by individual investors for individual investors.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of October 23, 2026.
Adam Spatacco has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
